Therms to kWh Converter
1 therm = 100,000 BTU exactly, and 1 kWh = 3,412.14156 BTU (International Table per ASTM C1100 and ISO 31-4). Therefore 1 therm = 100,000 / 3,412.14156 = 29.3071 kWh. The therm is...
Formula
Source: ASTM C1100, ISO 31-4, US EIA natural gas conversion standards | Last reviewed: June 27, 2026
Examples
1 therm
= 29.31 kWh
1 therm = 29.31 kWh (exact: 29.3071)
10 therm
= 293.07 kWh
10 therms (1 MMBTU) = 293.07 kWh
50 therm
= 1465.36 kWh
Approximate monthly gas usage for a 2,000 sq ft home in winter
100 therm
= 2930.71 kWh
Annual gas usage for a small commercial building (~5,000 sq ft)
1000 therm
= 29307.1 kWh
Annual gas usage for a large commercial building
10000 therm
= 293071 kWh
Annual gas usage for a small industrial facility
Quick Reference Table
| Therms/year | kWh/year | Typical Building Type |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 2931 | Apartment (gas heat only) |
| 400 | 11723 | Single-family home (moderate climate) |
| 600 | 17584 | Single-family home (cold climate) |
| 900 | 26376 | Single-family home (very cold climate) |
| 1000 | 29307 | Small commercial building |
| 3000 | 87921 | Large home or small commercial |
| 10000 | 293071 | Medium commercial building |
| 50000 | 1465355 | Large commercial or industrial |
| 200000 | 5861420 | Large industrial or district heating |
| Fuel | Unit Cost | Efficiency | Delivered Cost per 100k BTU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Gas | $1.50/therm | 95% AFUE furnace | $1.58 |
| Natural Gas | $2.00/therm | 80% AFUE furnace | $2.50 |
| Natural Gas | $1.50/therm | 60% AFUE boiler (older) | $2.50 |
| Electric Resistance | $0.15/kWh | 100% efficient | $4.40 |
| Heat Pump (COP 3.0) | $0.15/kWh | COP 3.0 | $1.47 |
| Heat Pump (COP 2.0) | $0.15/kWh | COP 2.0 (cold climate) | $2.20 |
| Fuel Oil #2 | $3.50/gal | 85% AFUE | $4.07 |
| Propane | $2.80/gal | 85% AFUE | $3.62 |
Where is this used?
Therefore 1 therm = 100,000 / 3,412.14156 = 29.3071 kWh.
The conversion is exact because the therm is defined as exactly 100,000 BTU.
The therm is the universal US natural gas billing unit — your monthly residential gas bill reports consumption in therms (or CCF, hundred cubic feet, where 1 CCF contains approximately 1.025 therms at standard gas heat content of 1,025 BTU per standard cubic foot).
This kWh-equivalent conversion is the single most important energy conversion for US building owners and facility managers evaluating whether to heat with natural gas or electricity.
At typical 2024-2026 US utility rates: 1 therm of natural gas costs approximately $1.20-$1.80 (residential, varies regionally), which delivers 29.3 kWh of heating energy — about $0.041-$0.061 per kWh-equivalent.
Residential electricity averages $0.15-$0.18/kWh nationally, making gas heat 2.5-4× cheaper per unit of raw energy.
However, the effective comparison must account for equipment efficiency: a condensing gas furnace at 95% AFUE delivers 0.95 therms of usable heat per therm purchased, while a heat pump with a COP (coefficient of performance) of 3.0 delivers 3 kWh of heat for every 1 kWh purchased.
At $1.50/therm gas and $0.15/kWh electricity, the cost per million BTU of delivered heat is $15.79 for gas (95% AFUE furnace) versus $14.65 for electricity (COP 3.0 heat pump) — remarkably close, and the balance tips with local utility rates, climate (COP varies with outdoor temperature), and carbon pricing.
In commercial and industrial settings, natural gas is often priced in $/MMBTU (dollars per million BTU) rather than $/therm, with 1 MMBTU = 10 therms = 293.07 kWh.
The NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract trades in $/MMBTU, and the conversion to $/kWh-equivalent is a standard energy market calculation: $3.00/MMBTU = $0.0102/kWh-equivalent, roughly 15× cheaper than wholesale electricity at $0.15/kWh.
This price differential is why natural gas combined-cycle power plants (which convert gas to electricity at ~55-60% thermal efficiency) can profitably sell electricity at $0.03-$0.04/kWh when gas is $3.00/MMBTU.
The therm-to-kWh conversion also underlies the EPA's Energy Star Portfolio Manager, which normalizes all building energy consumption (electricity in kWh, natural gas in therms, steam in klb, chilled water in ton-hours) to a common source energy basis (kBtu or GJ) for the 1-100 ENERGY STAR score.
The EPA's source-site ratio for natural gas is 1.05 (meaning 1.05 units of source energy — including extraction, processing, and transport losses — per 1 unit of site energy delivered as therms), while for electricity it's 2.80 (reflecting the ~65% generation and transmission losses in the US grid), making the source-energy comparison even more favorable to natural gas end-use than the simple site-energy therm-to-kWh conversion suggests.
Where therm-to-kWh conversions appear in real engineering work.
Building energy auditing and commissioning: An ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit involves a comprehensive walk-through and analysis of a building's energy consumption, comparing electricity (in kWh from the utility bill) and natural gas (in therms from the gas utility) on a common basis.
The audit report presents all energy consumption in kBtu or MMBTU: 1 therm = 100 kBtu = 0.1 MMBTU = 29.3 kWh.
A typical office building might consume 500,000 kWh of electricity and 5,000 therms of natural gas annually.
The therm-to-kWh equivalent for the gas: 5,000 × 29.3 = 146,500 kWh-equivalent.
Total energy consumption on a common basis: 500,000 + 146,500 = 646,500 kWh-equivalent.
This unified number is the basis for benchmarking against ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager and for prioritizing energy conservation measures (ECMs).
Comparing gas heat to electric heat options in building design: When designing a new building or selecting heating equipment for a retrofit, the engineer must compare the operating cost of gas heating (furnace, boiler) versus electric heating (resistance heater, heat pump).
The cost comparison requires three inputs: gas price (in $/therm or $/MMBTU), electricity price (in $/kWh), and equipment efficiency (AFUE for gas, COP or HSPF for electric).
The therm-to-kWh conversion (29.3 kWh/therm) is the foundation: at $1.50/therm, the gas costs $1.50/29.3 = $0.051 per kWh of raw energy.
A 95% AFUE furnace delivers $0.051/0.95 = $0.054 per kWh of delivered heat.
A heat pump at COP 3.0 with electricity at $0.15/kWh delivers $0.15/3.0 = $0.050 per kWh of delivered heat — essentially equivalent to gas at the conditions assumed.
The choice depends on the specific utility rates and climate, but the therm-to-kWh conversion is the bridge.
Utility integrated resource planning (IRP): State utility regulators require investor-owned utilities to file IRPs that document their long-term resource strategy, including demand-side management (DSM) programs and supply-side generation.
DSM savings are typically reported in kWh (electricity reduction) and therms (gas reduction), and the equivalent energy value is computed using the therm-to-kWh conversion.
A DSM program that saves 100,000 therms/year of gas (e.g., a high-efficiency furnace rebate program) is credited with saving 2,930,000 kWh/year of equivalent energy.
This allows the IRP to compare DSM savings against supply-side alternatives on a common basis.
Corporate carbon footprint and ESG reporting: Under the GHG Protocol, companies report Scope 1 (direct combustion, including natural gas burned on-site) and Scope 2 (purchased electricity) emissions.
Natural gas emissions are computed from the therm consumption: 11.7 lb CO₂/therm (EPA default emission factor for US natural gas combustion for heating).
Electricity emissions are computed from the kWh consumption: the EPA eGRID subregion emission factor (lb CO₂/kWh, ranging from 0.2 in Pacific Northwest to 1.5 in coal-heavy regions).
For carbon footprint reporting, the therm-to-kWh conversion is implicit in the per-unit emissions calculation.
A facility burning 1,000 therms/year and consuming 500,000 kWh/year has 11.7 × 1,000 = 11,700 lb CO₂ from gas (5.3 tonnes) and, at the US national average, 0.85 × 500,000 = 425,000 lb CO₂ from electricity (192.8 tonnes).
The total: 198.1 tonnes CO₂/year.
Building electrification cost-benefit analysis: Building electrification (replacing gas heating with heat pumps, gas water heaters with electric, gas stoves with induction) is a major decarbonization strategy.
The cost-benefit analysis must compare the operational cost of gas vs electric heating at the customer's local rates.
The therm-to-kWh conversion (29.3) is the multiplier that converts the gas bill to an electricity-equivalent cost.
A typical US home burning 600 therms/year at $1.50/therm spends $900/year on gas heating.
The same home with a COP 3.0 heat pump would need 600 × 29.3 / 3.0 = 5,860 kWh/year of electricity, costing $879/year at $0.15/kWh — about the same.
The decision depends on climate (COP varies with outdoor temperature), utility rates (the gas-vs-electric price ratio), and the carbon intensity of the grid.
Where therms-to-kWh conversions appear in everyday life.
Reading your residential gas bill: Your gas utility bills you in therms (or CCF, which is converted to therms).
Understanding the bill requires multiplying therms by your utility's gas rate (in $/therm) to get the dollar cost.
The therm-to-kWh conversion is implicit when comparing your gas bill to your electricity bill: if your gas bill shows 50 therms and your electric bill shows 1,500 kWh, your total energy consumption is 50 × 29.3 + 1,500 = 1,465 + 1,500 = 2,965 kWh-equivalent.
This unified number is the basis for any energy reduction goal — reducing 50 therms/year of gas consumption is equivalent to reducing 1,465 kWh/year of electricity in total energy terms.
Comparing space heating options for your home: When deciding between a new gas furnace and a heat pump for home heating, the therm-to-kWh conversion is the foundation of the operating cost comparison.
At typical US residential rates (2024-2026): gas $1.50/therm, electricity $0.15/kWh.
A gas furnace at 95% AFUE: operating cost = $1.50 / 29.3 / 0.95 = $0.054/kWh delivered heat.
A heat pump at COP 3.0 (mild climate): operating cost = $0.15 / 3.0 = $0.050/kWh delivered heat.
A heat pump at COP 2.0 (cold climate): operating cost = $0.15 / 2.0 = $0.075/kWh delivered heat.
The decision depends on your local climate (which determines heat pump COP) and your utility rates.
Energy audits for home improvements: When you hire a home energy auditor or use a tool like ENERGY STAR Home Advisor, the recommendations are typically presented in therms and kWh-equivalent savings.
Adding insulation to your attic might save 50 therms/year of natural gas heating ($75/year at $1.50/therm), which is 1,465 kWh-equivalent.
Sealing air leaks might save another 30 therms/year ($45, or 879 kWh-equivalent).
Adding a heat pump water heater saves 200 kWh/year of electric water heating directly.
The total savings is 2,544 kWh-equivalent per year, the unified metric for energy efficiency improvements.
Real-World Usage Scenarios
Building electrification feasibility study
A commercial office building in Boston (3 stories, 25,000 sq ft, currently heated by a 1990s-era 1,200 MBH gas boiler at 70% AFUE) is being evaluated for building electrification under the Massachusetts decarbonization mandate. The current gas consumption is 12,000 therms/year (gas cost $2.20/therm, annual heating bill $26,400). Converting to a heat pump system: 12,000 therms × 29.3 kWh/therm = 351,600 kWh of delivered heat. A COP 3.0 heat pump requires 351,600 / 3.0 = 117,200 kWh of electricity. At Boston's electricity rate of $0.22/kWh, the annual electricity cost is $25,784 — slightly less than the gas cost. But the heat pump is also more efficient at part-load conditions (the building is mostly at 30-50% heating load during shoulder seasons), so the actual operating cost is likely 15-20% lower than the simple calculation suggests. The economics depend on the gas vs electricity price ratio (here $2.20/therm vs $0.22/kWh = 6.45 ratio) and the climate (Boston's cold winters reduce heat pump COP, but ducted systems with backup resistance heat work well at design conditions).
Industrial process steam vs electric heat comparison
A food processing plant uses 50,000 therms/year of natural gas for process steam (a steam-heated kettle for sauce production, a steam-jacketed batch reactor, and boiler steam for facility heating). The plant considers replacing the gas-fired boiler with electric resistance heaters or a heat pump for the process heat. The therm-to-kWh conversion: 50,000 therms × 29.3 kWh/therm = 1,465,000 kWh of process heat. At industrial gas rates ($0.80/therm) vs electricity ($0.10/kWh), the operating cost comparison: gas $0.80/29.3 = $0.027/kWh raw × 0.85 AFUE boiler = $0.032/kWh delivered; electric resistance $0.10/kWh × 1.0 efficiency = $0.10/kWh delivered — electric is 3× more expensive. A heat pump (COP 4 for industrial process temperatures below 100 °C): $0.10/4.0 = $0.025/kWh delivered — slightly cheaper than gas. The heat pump option is feasible only for low-temperature process heat; for high-temperature process steam (above 150 °C, common in food processing), no heat pump technology is yet economical at the required temperature.
Hospital cogeneration plant fuel budget
A 400-bed hospital operates a 5 MW natural gas cogeneration (CHP) system supplying electricity and steam. The CHP consumes 80,000 therms/month of natural gas (960,000 therms/year) at a delivered gas rate of $0.75/therm. The CHP generates 4.0 MW of electricity (35 GWh/year) and 25,000 lb/hr of process steam (175,000 MMBTU/year of thermal output). The therm-to-kWh conversion is the basis for the CHP efficiency calculation: 80,000 therms/month × 29.3 kWh/therm × 0.001 MWh/kWh = 2,344 MWh/month of fuel energy input. The electricity output is 4.0 MW × 8,760 hr/yr ÷ 12 = 2,920 MWh/month. The electrical efficiency is 2,920 / 2,344 = 124% — but the overall CHP efficiency is much higher, including the useful thermal output. The therm-to-kWh conversion is implicit in every step: the fuel input in therms, the electricity output in kWh (or MWh), and the steam output in MMBTU (or lb × latent heat). Without the therm-to-kWh conversion, the efficiency calculations cannot be made on a common basis.
Residential fuel switching analysis
A homeowner in suburban Chicago (cold winters, average 5,500 heating degree days) is comparing the operating cost of their existing 80% AFUE gas furnace (gas consumption 850 therms/year, gas cost $1.30/therm, annual heating bill $1,105) to a new COP 3.2 cold-climate heat pump (heat pump rated performance at 5 °F = -15 °C: COP 2.0). The thermodynamic heat loss of the home is 60,000 BTU/hr at the design temperature (0 °F = -18 °C). Converting the gas heat to electricity-equivalent: 850 therms × 29.3 kWh/therm / 0.80 AFUE = 31,131 kWh of delivered heat per year. With the heat pump at an average seasonal COP of 2.7 (typical for Chicago climate): 31,131 / 2.7 = 11,530 kWh of electricity per year. At $0.14/kWh, the annual electricity cost is $1,614 — 46% higher than the gas furnace. The economics here favor gas, even with the heat pump's higher efficiency, because Chicago's cold winters reduce the COP below 3.0 for a significant portion of the heating season. A milder climate (e.g., Atlanta) would have an average seasonal COP of 3.5+, and the heat pump would be cheaper. The therm-to-kWh conversion makes these calculations straightforward.
Industry Standards Referenced
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between a therm and a CCF?
A CCF is 100 cubic feet (centum cubic feet) of natural gas, a volume measurement. A therm is approximately 100,000 BTU, a heat content measurement. Because natural gas has an approximate heating value of 1,025 BTU per standard cubic foot, 1 CCF contains about 1.025 therms of energy. Your gas bill typically shows usage in CCF (the meter reads volume) and converts to therms by multiplying by the gas heat content factor (BTU/SCF ÷ 1,000), which varies slightly month to month based on the gas quality and is listed on your bill. For most practical calculations, 1 CCF ≈ 1 therm — the 2.5% difference is within the accuracy of most cost comparisons.
How much does 1 therm of gas cost?
US residential natural gas prices range from about $0.80/therm (Louisiana, Oklahoma, areas near production) to $2.50/therm (Northeast, California, areas with pipeline constraints) as of 2025-2026. The national average is about $1.20-$1.50/therm for residential customers. Commercial and industrial rates are typically 20-40% lower. Your actual bill includes distribution charges, customer charges, and taxes on top of the commodity gas cost. The commodity cost of gas (the gas itself, before delivery charges) typically represents 40-50% of the total residential bill.
Is heating with gas or electricity cheaper right now?
It depends on your local rates, equipment efficiency, and climate. For a quick comparison: multiply your gas price ($/therm) by 29.3 to convert to $/kWh-equivalent. Then divide by your furnace efficiency. For electric, divide your electricity rate by your heat pump COP. Example: $1.50/therm → $1.50 × 29.3 / 0.95 = $46.3 per million BTU equivalent (gas, 95% AFUE furnace). $0.15/kWh / 3.0 COP = $0.05/kWh delivered → $14.65 per million BTU (electric, COP 3.0 heat pump). At these rates, gas is 3.2× cheaper per unit of delivered heat. But if your electricity rate is $0.08/kWh and gas is $2.00/therm, the heat pump wins — this is the case in parts of the Pacific Northwest with cheap hydroelectric power.
Why does my bill say CCF instead of therms?
CCF (hundred cubic feet) is the volume measurement read directly from your gas meter. The gas utility converts CCF to therms for billing because they're selling you energy, not volume — the heat content of natural gas varies by source (typically 1,000-1,100 BTU per cubic foot), so volume alone doesn't tell you how much energy you received. The conversion: CCF × heat content factor (BTU/SCF, listed on your bill) ÷ 100,000 = therms. Most bills show both CCF (the meter reading) and therms (the energy delivered), with the heat content factor printed for transparency.
How does the therm-to-kWh conversion relate to source energy in EPA Portfolio Manager?
EPA Portfolio Manager uses source energy (not site energy) for benchmarking. Source energy includes the upstream losses: for natural gas, the source-site ratio is 1.05 (5% losses for extraction, processing, and transport); for electricity, the source-site ratio is 2.80 (180% losses for generation and transmission, on average). When converting therms to kWh-equivalent source energy: 1 therm × 29.3 kWh/therm × 1.05 source ratio = 30.8 kWh source. When converting kWh to source energy: 1 kWh × 2.80 = 2.8 kWh source. A building consuming 100 therms and 10,000 kWh has source energy of 100 × 30.8 + 10,000 × 2.8 = 3,080 + 28,000 = 31,080 kWh source. This source-energy number is what ENERGY STAR scores compare against.
Is the 29.3071 factor exact?
Yes, to four significant figures. It derives from the definitions: 1 therm = 100,000 BTU exactly, 1 kWh = 3,600,000 J exactly (1,000 W × 3,600 s), 1 BTU (International Table) = 1,055.05585262 J exactly (per ASTM C1100 and ISO 31-4). Therefore 1 therm = 100,000 × 1,055.05585262 / 3,600,000 = 29.30710702 kWh exactly. The commonly used 29.3071 has 6 significant figures and 0.0001% precision — well within the accuracy of any utility meter (±2% for residential, ±1% for commercial, ±0.5% for industrial).
Reviewed for accuracy
Verified against US EIA energy conversion factors and EPA Portfolio Manager technical reference · Last reviewed: June 27, 2026
All calculations are for reference only. Always verify with manufacturer data and a qualified engineer for critical applications. Learn about our editorial process.