Skip to content

BTU to Joules Converter

The International Table BTU (BTU_IT) is defined as exactly 1,055.05585262 joules per ISO 31-4 (now ISO 80000-5). Therefore 1 BTU = 1.055056 kJ (kilojoules). This is the standard...

Quick try

Formula

Source: ISO 31-4 (ISO 80000-5), NIST Special Publication 811 | Last reviewed: June 27, 2026

Examples

1 BTU

= 1.0551 kJ

1 BTU = 1.055 kJ

1000 BTU

= 1055.1 kJ

1,000 BTU = 1,055 kJ = 1.055 MJ

3412.14 BTU

= 3600 kJ

3,412 BTU = 3,600 kJ = 1 kWh

100000 BTU

= 105506 kJ

100,000 BTU (1 therm) = 105.5 MJ

1000000 BTU

= 1055056 kJ

1 MMBTU = 1.055 GJ

Quick Reference Table

BTU to kJ Quick Reference
BTUkJContext
11.0551 BTU
100105.5Small energy quantity
100010551 kBtu = 1.055 MJ
341236001 kWh
100001055010 kBtu = 10.55 MJ
1000001055061 therm = 105.5 MJ

Where is this used?

The International Table BTU (BTU_IT) is defined as exactly 1,055.05585262 joules per ISO 31-4 (now ISO 80000-5).

Therefore 1 BTU = 1.055056 kJ (kilojoules).

This is the standard conversion used in all engineering work unless dealing with archaic BTU definitions.

Historically, the BTU has had several definitions because it was originally defined as the energy required to raise one pound of water by 1°F, which varies slightly with the starting temperature of the water: the 'mean BTU' (1,055.87 J, average from 32°F to 212°F), the '39°F BTU' (1,059.67 J, at water's maximum density), the '59°F BTU' (1,054.80 J, widely used in the US), and the 'thermochemical BTU' (1,054.35 J, used in some older US chemical engineering contexts).

The International Table BTU at 1,055.056 J was standardized to eliminate this confusion and is now the universal engineering standard.

The 0.1% differences between historical BTU definitions matter in custody transfer and precision energy accounting but are negligible for most HVAC and process engineering work.

The BTU-to-kJ conversion is the fundamental bridge between the US customary energy system and the SI system.

Every thermodynamic property, specific heat (BTU/lb·°F vs kJ/kg·K), thermal conductivity (BTU/hr·ft·°F vs W/m·K), enthalpy of vaporization (BTU/lb vs kJ/kg), heating value (BTU/lb vs kJ/kg or MJ/kg), requires this conversion when crossing between US and international datasheets.

The specific heat of water is exactly 1 BTU/lb·°F = 4.1868 kJ/kg·K, both values are inherent to the definition of the respective units.

This exact correspondence (1 °F = 5/9 °C, 1 lb = 0.45359237 kg) means that any material property expressed in BTU/lb·°F can be directly converted to kJ/kg·K by multiplying by 4.1868.

The natural gas heating value of approximately 1,025 BTU/SCF converts to approximately 1,081 kJ/SCF, or about 38.1 MJ/m³ at standard conditions, the typical European natural gas quality specification.

The combustion enthalpy of methane: approximately 23,875 BTU/lb (lower heating value, LHV) = 55,533 kJ/kg = 55.5 MJ/kg, a value that appears in both US and international combustion textbooks.

The conversion from BTU to kJ is the most commonly performed energy unit conversion in international engineering, comparable in frequency to the °F-to-°C temperature conversion or the psi-to-bar pressure conversion.

Where BTU-to-kJ conversions appear in real engineering work.

Converting US equipment datasheets (BTU/hr, BTU/lb, BTU/ft³) to SI for international project documentation.

Translating HVAC heating and cooling loads from US Manual J calculations (in BTU/hr) to kW and kJ for European energy performance certification (EPC).

Converting fuel heating values from BTU/lb or BTU/gal to kJ/kg or MJ/L for combustion calculations.

Bridging US-published material property data (ASM Handbook, ASHRAE Fundamentals, Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook US editions) with international property databases (DIPPR, NIST REFPROP, DECHEMA).

Converting US building energy consumption (in BTU or kBtu) to GJ for international benchmarking (Energy Star score, BREEAM, LEED v4 international).

Real-World Usage Scenarios

International chiller specification comparison

A US data center designer is evaluating chiller bids from US and European manufacturers. The Trane (US) bid specifies a 1,500-ton (1,500 × 12,000 BTU/hr = 18,000,000 BTU/hr cooling) chiller with a COP of 6.1 at AHRI conditions. The Frigosystem (Italy) bid specifies an equivalent chiller at 18,900 kW cooling capacity (the metric equivalent: 18,900 × 3,412 / 1000 = 64.5 MMBTU/hr cooling capacity) with a COP of 6.0 at EN 14511 conditions. Converting to SI for direct comparison: 18,000,000 BTU/hr = 18.0 MMBTU/hr = 5,275 kW cooling. The 5,275 kW is less than the 5,500 kW (18,900 / 3.412) implied by the Frigosystem nameplate, the discrepancy is because the US AHRI and European EN 14511 standard rating conditions differ slightly (AHRI at 54 °F leaving water, 44 °F entering; EN 14511 at 7 °C/12 °C water = 45 °F/54 °F). The BTU-to-kJ conversion allows the comparison but the standard condition correction is needed for accurate performance comparison.

Industry Standards Referenced

ISO 31-4 ISO 80000-5 NIST SP 811

Frequently Asked Questions

Which BTU definition does this converter use?

The International Table BTU (BTU_IT) = 1,055.05585262 J, per ISO 31-4 (now ISO 80000-5). This is the standard used in all modern engineering work, ASHRAE handbooks, and NIST publications. If you encounter data based on the thermochemical BTU (1,054.35 J), common in older US chemical engineering references, the difference is 0.07%, negligible for almost all purposes. If you have custody-transfer or regulatory data where the definition matters, verify which BTU standard your data source uses.

Why doesn't the US just switch to joules?

The same reason they haven't switched to metric for construction, transportation, and daily life: the installed base of documentation, equipment, and professional practice is enormous. Every US building code (IECC, ASHRAE 90.1), every HVAC equipment catalog (Trane, Carrier, York, Daikin US), every boiler specification, and every natural gas bill uses BTU. Converting this ecosystem would cost billions and introduce errors across millions of documents. The pragmatic approach, the one the engineering profession has adopted, is to maintain fluency in both systems and convert accurately when bridging them.

What does this converter do?

This converter performs the unit conversion at standard conditions using the exact conversion factor. The result is displayed with appropriate precision for engineering use.

Reviewed for accuracy

Verified against NIST and ISO standard BTU-to-joule conversion factor · Last reviewed: June 27, 2026

All calculations are for reference only. Always verify with manufacturer data and a qualified engineer for critical applications. Learn about our editorial process.

Related Conversions

See all Energy converters