Skip to content

EER to kW/Ton Calculator

EER (Energy Efficiency Ratio) is the cooling capacity in BTU per hour divided by the electrical power input in watts, at a specific AHRI 550/590 test condition (typically 95°F...

Quick try

Formula

Source: ASHRAE 90.1, AHRI 550/590 | Last reviewed: June 12, 2026

Examples

10 eer

= 1.2 kwrt

EER 10 = 1.2 kW/ton — ASHRAE 90.1 minimum for air-cooled chillers < 150 tons

12 eer

= 1 kwrt

EER 12 = 1.0 kW/ton — high-efficiency benchmark

15 eer

= 0.8 kwrt

EER 15 = 0.8 kW/ton — premium inverter-driven chiller

8 eer

= 1.5 kwrt

EER 8 = 1.5 kW/ton — older equipment, upgrade candidate

Quick Reference Table

EER to kW/ton Quick Reference
EERkW/tonCOPEfficiency Level
81.52.34Minimum (older equipment)
91.332.64Standard efficiency
101.22.93ASHRAE 90.1-2019 minimum
111.093.22High efficiency
1213.52Premium efficiency
140.8574.1Best-in-class air-cooled
180.6675.28Water-cooled centrifugal
200.65.86Magnetic bearing chiller

Popular Conversions

Quick answers for the most-searched eer to kwrt values.

EER 10 to kW/ton

10 eer = 1.2 kwrt

ASHRAE 90.1-2019 minimum for air-cooled chillers below 150 tons. Most utility rebate programs use this as the baseline for incentive calculations.

EER 12 to kW/ton

12 eer = 1 kwrt

The ideal 1.0 kW/ton benchmark. High-efficiency inverter-driven chillers at EER 12 consume exactly 1 kilowatt per ton — a memorable reference point for engineers.

EER 8 to kW/ton

8 eer = 1.5 kwrt

Older or budget equipment. At 1.5 kW/ton, these chillers consume 50% more electricity than an EER 12 unit. Strong upgrade candidate — replacement often pays back in 2-3 years.

EER 15 to kW/ton

15 eer = 0.8 kwrt

Premium air-cooled chiller efficiency. At 0.8 kW/ton, these units use 33% less energy than baseline. Common for LEED and Net Zero projects with aggressive energy targets.

EER 18 to kW/ton

18 eer = 0.667 kwrt

Best-in-class water-cooled centrifugal chiller. Magnetic bearing, oil-free compressors achieve EER 18-20 (0.60-0.67 kW/ton), ideal for district cooling plants and data centers.

COP 4 to kW/ton

13.65 eer = 0.88 kwrt

COP 4 = EER 13.65 = 0.88 kW/ton. Common benchmark for European heat pump efficiency (COP measured at rated conditions). Above COP 4 is generally considered premium.

Where is this used?

EER to kW/ton conversion is essential for comparing chiller bids across manufacturers.

US manufacturers typically rate equipment in EER, while European and Asian bidders use kW/ton or COP.

ASHRAE 90.1 sets minimum EER requirements by equipment type and capacity.

For energy modeling and life-cycle cost analysis, convert everything to kW/ton for a common efficiency baseline.

Also useful for verifying utility rebate eligibility, which often requires minimum EER thresholds.

In chiller bid evaluation and selection, the EER-to-kW/ton conversion is the primary tool for comparing equipment from different manufacturers using different rating systems — a US bid showing EER 10.5 for a 200-ton water-cooled centrifugal chiller and a German bid showing 1.14 kW/ton (or COP 3.08) for an equivalent Trane/Carrier/DAIKIN model represent the same efficiency (1.14 kW/ton = 12/10.5 = 1.143 kW/ton from the US bid, a 0.3% difference well within test tolerance).

The conversion allows the engineer to make a fair comparison and proceed to other selection criteria (capacity turndown, sound, service, parts availability, warranty).

ASHRAE 90.1-2019 Table 6.8.1-3 (and the more recent 90.1-2022 and 90.1-2025) specifies the minimum EER and IPLV for chillers by equipment type and capacity, with air-cooled chillers below 150 tons requiring EER ≥ 10.0 (1.20 kW/ton), water-cooled centrifugal chillers below 300 tons requiring EER ≥ 15.9 (0.755 kW/ton), and the requirements increasing with capacity.

Building energy modeling and life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) per ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix F uses kW/ton as the input to the energy cost calculation, with the chiller efficiency directly determining the annual energy cost and the 20- or 30-year present value.

Utility rebate programs for high-efficiency chillers (Focus on Energy, Mass Save, NYSERDA, ENERGY STAR for chillers) typically require a minimum efficiency above the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline by 5–15%, with the rebate amount proportional to the kW/ton reduction.

The conversion from EER to kW/ton is used at the rebate application step to verify eligibility.

LEED v4.1 and the newer LEED v5 for Building Design and Construction have minimum efficiency requirements (EER or COP) for the HVAC equipment, and the conversion to kW/ton is used in the energy modeling documentation for the LEED submission.

The US DOE Building Energy Codes Program and the ENERGY STAR Most Efficient recognition for chillers use kW/ton as the primary comparison metric.

Data center chiller selection per ASHRAE TC 9.9 and the 2024 ASHRAE Liquid Cooling Guidelines specifies high-efficiency chillers (typically water-cooled centrifugal or screw at 0.50–0.65 kW/ton) for the high-density IT load, with the conversion applied at the equipment specification step.

Real-World Usage Scenarios

Chiller bid comparison: US vs European manufacturer

A facilities engineer receives two bids for a 200-ton chiller: Bid A (US) claims EER 10.5, Bid B (Germany) quotes 1.14 kW/ton. Converting Bid A: kW/ton = 12 ÷ 10.5 = 1.143 kW/ton. The difference is negligible — both bids are effectively identical in efficiency. The engineer proceeds to evaluate maintenance costs, warranty, and local service support. Without the EER-to-kW/ton conversion, the bids appeared incomparable.

ASHRAE 90.1 compliance check for new construction

An energy modeler is checking a proposed 80-ton air-cooled scroll chiller against ASHRAE 90.1-2019 minimum requirements. The spec sheet shows EER = 9.8. Converting: kW/ton = 12 ÷ 9.8 = 1.224 kW/ton. ASHRAE 90.1 Table 6.8.1-3 requires ≤ 1.20 kW/ton for this size range. The chiller fails by 0.024 kW/ton — the engineer flags this for VE (value engineering) or requests the next efficiency tier.

Utility rebate eligibility calculation

A utility company offers $75/ton rebate for chillers exceeding ASHRAE 90.1 minimum by 10%. For a 150-ton air-cooled chiller (baseline 1.20 kW/ton), the threshold for rebate is 1.08 kW/ton. The proposed chiller has EER = 11.5, which converts to 12 ÷ 11.5 = 1.043 kW/ton — exceeding the threshold by 3.4%. The owner qualifies for $75 × 150 = $11,250 rebate, reducing the premium cost of the high-efficiency unit.

Industry Standards Referenced

ASHRAE 90.1 AHRI 550/590

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good EER rating for a chiller?

For air-cooled chillers, EER ≥ 10 is standard, ≥ 12 is high-efficiency, and ≥ 14 is premium. For water-cooled chillers, EER ≥ 15 is standard and ≥ 20 is premium. Always check ASHRAE 90.1 Table 6.8.1-3 for your specific equipment type and capacity range.

How are EER, COP, and kW/ton related?

COP = EER ÷ 3.412. kW/ton = 12 ÷ EER = 3.517 ÷ COP. All three measure the same thing — cooling output per energy input — expressed in different units. EER is US-centric, COP is international, and kW/ton is the most intuitive (lower is better).

What is the ASHRAE 90.1 minimum EER for my chiller?

It depends on equipment type and capacity. Air-cooled chillers < 150 tons require EER ≥ 10.0 (1.20 kW/ton). Air-cooled ≥ 150 tons: EER ≥ 10.1. Water-cooled centrifugal < 300 tons: EER ≥ 15.9. Check ASHRAE 90.1-2019 Table 6.8.1-3 for the full matrix — requirements increase with capacity and are more stringent for water-cooled.

Is higher EER always better?

Yes — higher EER means lower energy consumption and operating cost. However, premium efficiency chillers cost more upfront. Perform a life-cycle cost analysis: incremental capital ÷ annual energy savings = simple payback period. A payback under 3-5 years usually justifies the premium. Also consider utility rebates, which can significantly improve the economics.

Why do European manufacturers use kW/ton instead of EER?

kW/ton is an SI-derived metric that's more intuitive: it directly tells you the electrical power consumption per unit of cooling. '1.0 kW/ton' is easier to visualize than 'EER 12.' COP is the European standard (COP = kW_cooling ÷ kW_electric), while kW/ton is the inverse. Use our calculator to convert between all three seamlessly.

Reviewed for accuracy

Reviewed against ASHRAE 90.1-2019 Table 6.8.1-3 and AHRI 550/590 chiller standards · Last reviewed: June 12, 2026

All calculations are for reference only. Always verify with manufacturer data and a qualified engineer for critical applications. Learn about our editorial process.

Related Conversions

See all Hvac converters

Further Reading